The coronavirus needs no introduction. In a few short months, it has inflicted large-scale damage and promises to permeate the fabric of our lives. As the world begins to reopen and establishing a New Normal, dentistry must adjust its practices to maintain a safe and healthy work environment, including the vexing problem of aerosol-borne infections. This paper will address one part of the solution, cold-fogging of chemical disinfectants, by discussing the rationale and science of this treatment.



Aerosols are mists of particles less than 5 microns in diameter. Droplets are larger particles (> 5 microns) and many activities generate both droplets and aerosol. (TABLE 1).

TABLE 1. Droplets and Aerosols

(<5 microns)
(>5 microns)
Breathing    X  
Speaking    X  
Singing    X  
Coughing    X XX
Sneezing    X XX
Aerosol Generating Procedures    XX X


While droplets are a major mode of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, there is increasing concern over aerosol and fomites (contaminated surfaces) as additional avenues of transmission. Dentistry is replete with procedures that generate high volumes of aerosols, perhaps more than in any other medical specialty. Examples are illustrated in TABLE 2.

TABLE 2. Examples of Aerosol Generating Procedures in Dentistry

Coughing during intraoral radiograph
Dental drills
Aerosol spray from water used to cool drill points
Air/water syringes
Ultrasonic scalers


Issues in Dentistry

The CDC has released new guidance indicating that 35% of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic and 40% of disease transmission is mediated through asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic patients. Asymptomatic carriers have similar viral loads to symptomatic patients and while less likely to eject droplets through coughing they are just as likely as symptomatic patients to transmit the disease through aerosol emission from the oral cavity. Disease transmission through droplets and aerosol depends on proximity to infected patients, duration of exposure, and the viral loads of infected patients. The dental healthcare giver is therefore vulnerable on all counts, rendering their management of aerosolized viruses of paramount importance. Since dental procedures are likely postponed in all symptomatic patients, we are less concerned about droplet transmission of the disease. However, both fomite and aerosol transmission in the dental office need to be addressed aggressively.

Since surface disinfection protocols are already commonplace in dentistry, we will not address fomite transmission in this paper. We will instead focus on aerosols as a potential modality of disease transmission.

1. Is the virus in the air?

While there has been much debate as to whether the coronavirus is found in the air, two recent publications are noteworthy:

  1. Air samples were obtained in two Wuhan hospitals, in the foyer of a residential building and in a supermarket. Viable viruses were found suspended in the air in places with poor ventilation: in the patient restroom of one hospital, and in the staff changing rooms in both hospitals where donning and duffing of PPEs take place. Low concentrations were found in the negative pressure rooms of the ICU and CCU, as well as in the hospital corridors and in the common area of the residential building. No virus was found in the air of the supermarket.2
  2. At the Nebraska Medical Center, patients with known COVID infections were kept in isolation rooms (either in the Nebraska Biocontainment Unit or the Nebraska Quarantine Unit). 80.4% of air samples from various places in these rooms were positive for viral particles.3

In both studies, the presence of virus was determined by presence of viral RNA as determined by the rtRTPCR assay.

2. How long can the coronavirus remain viable in aerosol?

  1. In the seminal NEJM article on Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2, the virus in aerosol remained viable for more than three hours.4
  2. A multi-center study showed unusual persistence when aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 was maintained in air suspension via a rotating drum. Particles of virus could still infect cells and appeared intact under electron microscopy after 16 hours. (FIGURE 1).

These studies suggest that aerosolized viruses can persist for long duration of time. The question, then, is what quantity of aerosolized viral particles presents an infectious hazard.

Figure 1

FIGURE 1: Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in Aerosol to beyond 16 hours5

3. Can aerosolized viruses transmit human infection?

Since subjects should not knowingly be exposed to aerosolized viruses, we must examine instances where it is clear that transmission was neither by droplets nor by fomite.

  1. Evaluation of a coronavirus disease outbreak in a call center in South Korea suggests that airflow played a significant role. (FIGURE 2).
    In this call center, almost all those infected were on one side of the room and were therefore exposed to the same air-conditioning and ventilation unit.
    Very few workers outside that immediate area were infected.
    Figure 2

    FIGURE 2: Call center in South Korea where outbreak correlated with air flow pattern

  2. In a restaurant in Guangzhou, China, the pattern of infection appears to reflect the airflow of the air-conditioning unit. (FIGURE 3).
    Over a 73-minute period, index patient A1, who subsequently was diagnosed to have COVID-19, infected participants at tables A, B, and C, which were all in the line of the air-conditioning airflow.
    Infection was not evident when people were not directly in the line of the airflow. Indeed, infection did not occur in the 73 other people who were dining in the restaurant that day, nor did it occur in the 8 servers working on the floor.
    Figure 3

    FIGURE 3: Infection of Adjacent Tables in Direct Line of Airflow7

  3. 32 confirmed and 20 probable secondary COVID-19 cases occurred after a 2.5-hour choir practice in Skagit County, Washington attended by 61 persons, including one symptomatic index patient. (FIGURE 4).
    Figure 4
    FIGURE 4

These studies from around the globe indicate that close proximity aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is not only possible but highly probable.

Aerosols in Dentistry

In view of the concerns that asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic patients may be in the dental chair undergoing aerosol-generating procedures, many proposals have been made to minimize the impact of these potentially infective and persistent aerosols, including the use of air purifiers, filtering HVAC systems, and industrial-strength UV-C lights. In this paper we examine an additional technology, ultra-low volume fogging of hypochlorous acid (HOCI). Based on our analysis, we recommend that the aerosolization of hypochlorous acid at 200 ppm is an important addition to conventional disinfection in combating aerosolized viruses. Conventional disinfection is a 2-D solution, but we are fighting a 3-D war (a “STAR War”), and hypochlorous acid provides that extra dimension of fighting power.


Ultra-Low Volume Fogging for Disinfection of Indoor Spaces

It is important to emphasize that chemical fogging should be an adjunct to conventional disinfection and not a replacement for traditional decontamination. The use of disinfectants on visibly soiled areas/surfaces and the complete scrubbing and wiping down of trays, tables, chairs, lights, and instruments are of greater importance in the SARS-CoV-2 era as ever before. The addition of fogging is designed to address the aerosolized threat and to allow disinfectants to fumigate into spaces that are not otherwise reachable by wiping.

To fog a liquid is to create a mist of very small particles. The mist is released into an enclosed space. Over several minutes, the mist lands on surfaces, where it helps kill bacteria and viruses, before evaporating shortly thereafter. Foggers use large amounts of low-pressure air to aerosolize liquids before dispersing the mist through a nozzle9. Traditional spraying creates particles in the 50-micron range while fogging a liquid can result in fine particles under 20 microns in size.

Since the 1980s, ultra-low volume foggers have become quite important in the greenhouse industry10 as the fogging of pesticides has become the mainstay of insect control. Fogging, rather than directional spraying, has superior surface area coverage: the fog lingers, allowing it to fully envelop a space, including hard-to-reach areas. The process is relatively automated and very little labor is involved except for filling the solution tanks and moving the fogging machines. In greenhouses, many of the pesticide targets are smaller than 50 microns, so ULV fogging’s ability to create small particles is crucial.11

With the ongoing pandemic, fogging is increasingly important in augmenting conventional disinfection to allow for inexpensive, quick, and effective disinfection of large areas. In all instances, fogging is not a replacement for traditional spray-down and wipe-cleaning protocols, but it is a potent complementary technology.12

Many sectors have started using chemical fogging to help combat the coronavirus:

Airline industry: Since February, Delta Airlines has been fogging the insides of planes arriving from Asia.13 Other airlines soon followed suit (American, United, Frontier).

Hotels have also begun to fog; Marriot plans to roll out fogging devices to over 7000 of its hotels over the next several months.14

Hospitals: Early in February, Halosil International sent 150 foggers to Chinese hospitals.15

In many instances, the chemical that is being fogged is not disclosed. Reports simply indicate that the substance is not toxic to humans after application.

Cruise lines have been the first to indicate that they are using hypochlorous acid as a safe disinfectant. Norwegian Cruise Line is using chemical fogging to disinfect public areas, cabins, and galleys on it cruise ships.16

Fogging is also an important adjunct in disinfecting trains, buses, schools, nursing homes, offices, warehouses, and grocery stores.

Hypochlorous Acid as a Disinfectant

SARS-CoV-2 is a fragile lipid-enveloped RNA virus that is extremely sensitive to chemicals. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has created a registered list, List N, of confirmed disinfectants for use against the virus.17 The list currently contains almost 500 chemical products, the vast majority of which can kill the virus in under a minute. There are 6 major categories of approved disinfectants: hypochlorous acid, hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium, peroxyacetic acid, glutaraldehyde, and sodium hypochlorite.

Hypochlorous acid is the disinfectant we chose for ultra-low volume fogging because of its safety profile and its ease of use when compared to any of the other five categories of listed disinfectants.

Interestingly, hypochlorous acid is nature’s oldest disinfectant; it is the way the human body defends itself against infection. In the bloodstream and in tissues, neutrophils produce hypochlorous acid against invading pathogens.

Discovered around 1870, hypochlorous acid is an organically produced chemical with disinfectant properties.18 During WWI, artificially made hypochlorous acid was used as a disinfectant and antiseptic. At the time, the technology to create hypochlorous acid remained imperfect. The resultant solutions often had varying concentrations and the inherent chemical instability led to degradation within days. The particles would reform in different chlorine groups, leaving behind weaker disinfectants and potentially harmful chlorine solutions.19 It was not until the 1980s that hypochlorous acid use would rise again, as it now can be produced by electrolysis in a stable form. Since then, it has been deployed in many industries, from hospitals and operating rooms to daycare centers and farms.20

Hypochlorous acid is extremely safe. In fact, it is eye-friendly, skin-friendly, inhalable, and ingestible. Unlike bleach, for example, it does not damage clothing or furniture. Handling hypochlorous acid requires no face mask, eye protection, gloves, or PPEs. It is not caustic or corrosive, evaporates rapidly without leaving residue when fogged, and can be used on cell phones, computer screens, tablets, and keyboards. It is already in clinical use in a large variety of situations, as illustrated in FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5. Clinical Uses of Hypochlorous Acid

At 20 ppm    Eye rinse
At 60 ppm    No rinse sanitizer for food
At 100 ppm    Wound cleanser
At >200 ppm    Disinfectant
At >200 ppm    Cold ULV Fogging


Testing in vitro against avian influenza virus (AIV), researchers showed that 100 ppm and 200 ppm solutions neutralized AIV within 5 seconds, while 50 ppm required several minutes.21 For cold ULV fogging, we suggest using 200 ppm.

In the Far East, patrons in restaurants, theaters, hospitals, and gymnasiums are regularly fogged with 100-200 ppm of hypochlorous acid, which attests to its safety and ease of use. At this concentration, it has a faint chlorine smell which dissipates once the disinfectant has evaporated.

ULV foggers are not quiet machines and ought to be used at times when the noise would be least disruptive.



Ultra-low volume fogging using 200 ppm Hypochlorous Acid should be used as an adjunct to conventional disinfecting protocols. It offers an opportunity to address aerosolized viruses and would also help to decontaminate potential fomites.

For details about The New Normal, Dental Response to COVID, please visit us at for the 24-page manual. 


Paper links by section:

Issues in dentistry:

Is the virus in the air:

How long the virus can remain in aerosol:

Can aerosolized virus transmit human infection:

ULV Fogging for Disinfection:

Hypochlorous Acid as a Disinfectant:

Other references: